SocialismToday           Socialist Party magazine
 

Socialism Today 144 - December/January 2010/11

Made in Dagenham in 1968

Following the review of the hit film, Made in Dagenham, in the last edition of Socialism Today, we reprint an article (slightly edited for space) written at the time of the Dagenham strike by Clare Doyle (née Paget), from the July 1968 issue of The Militant (No.39).

"WHAT HAVE they [Ford] got to lose? 187 at 5d an hour? That’s a pittance, they could get us back tomorrow. And them making millions. This is their boom year". This comment, from one of the women car-seat cover machinists on strike at Ford’s Dagenham factory, points to the real significance of their struggle.

Forced to lay off thousands of workers and lose £1.25 million a day (a small enough percentage of its massive super-profits nevertheless) while the strike lasts, Ford – Britain’s leading exporter – sees not only its precious system of plant bargaining threatened but also its ability to exploit its female workers and undercut the men’s rates of pay…

The women there start their arduous work (many men wouldn’t do it) at 7.30am with nothing but a ten-minute break in the morning and three quarters of an hour for lunch, before they finish work at 4.15pm. Labouring at heavy machines, scarred through handling unwieldy materials, they are expected to turn out 55 seat cushions an hour, 240 bucket seats or 250 head-linings a day.

If the Ford women win on this regrading issue, the movement will not stop at that. In their fight against ‘sex discrimination’ they have widespread support from their own union, the National Union of Vehicle Builders – "As far as we are concerned we have no second-class members" – the men at their factory, the 195 women at the Halewood factory who have come out in sympathy, the AEU [engineers’ union] and the Bakers’ Union at their conferences, union branches in other sections of industry, trades councils, Labour parties, Young Socialists and individuals prepared to send donations to their strike fund.

With their new-found strength the Ford women will no longer be afraid to complain about their conditions – fear of victimisation had compelled them to stay at their work in the rain with their macs on. They have already shown their determination to achieve their demand by refusing to accept a ‘fact-finding’ committee, and agreeing not to meet to discuss the strike for another week: "Court of inquiry or not, we are, not going back until we get the money". (Morning Star, 22 June 1968)…

Taking home £12-13 a week [equivalent to £136 today], the Ford women are ‘well off’ compared with most women workers. More than half the nine million women workers earn less than five shillings [25p or the equivalent of £3.25] an hour and less than one in 30 receives as much as ten shillings. According to the Survey of Women’s Employment, of those doing skilled manual work, nearly two thirds earned less than five shillings an hour and only one in 90 got ten shillings. Two fifths of those paid weekly had earned less than £6 gross in the previous week to the survey…

The Ford machinists are simply demanding a recognition of their skill. The lowest-paid unskilled man at the Ford works has a higher hourly rate of pay than the women…

Although girls had as good a performance at O-level standards as boys when they left school, only 7% entered apprenticeships (predominantly hairdressing) compared with 43% of boys. Only 29% of female manual workers in industry were classified as skilled, compared with 49% of male manual workers. Yet during the last war, women were trained without difficulty to do many types of traditionally male work…

The fact that women make up one third of the labour force with over half working five days a week and that the number of women working has increased by 1.6 million since 1950 are simply not reflected in an increase in opportunities in most areas of employment. Only about one woman in 20 is employed in a managerial capacity – in some industries only one in 100!…

After half a century of votes for women, fewer than one million of them have even achieved equality of pay for equal work. Women are still regarded as second-class citizens educated for a domestic role and legally subject to their husbands on many matters. Even trade union officials bargaining on wage agreements accept smaller percentage increases for their women workers. In view of their position in society and at work, it is not surprising that many female workers are not members of trade unions. But, as Dr Summerskill says: "Up to now women have passively accepted their exploitation. This strike could spark off serious industrial unrest which cannot be ignored. Working women can make or break the economy. The down-trodden women of today are the strikers of tomorrow".

There have been signs of gathering impatience at union conferences at the [Labour] government’s refusal to carry out its pledge on equal pay. If the employers say they cannot afford it they must open their books to prove it. Ford has £100 million in reserve out of which last year it paid £6 million in dividends to shareholders, yet it refuses to pay a living wage to an extra-exploited section of its workers.

If a modern and advanced industry like this cannot even guarantee the most elementary standards, while it remains in private hands, then it should be handed over to the working population. The demands by delegates of the NUVB conference for the nationalisation of the car-manufacturing industry should be completely supported, and extended to the many other industries which refuse to pay workers a living wage.

This inevitably links the women’s struggle to that of the apprentices and young workers and all those who are forced to accept the role of cheap labour which, in a period of rising unemployment, threatens the security and living standards of the higher-paid workers too. That is why the whole of the labour movement must take up the women’s fight as their own and why women must take their demands to the unions and to the Labour Party branches. First white-collar unions and now women: the ranks of the working-class militants are growing from day to day – the profiteers must be shaking in their shoes!

 


Home About Us | Back Issues | Reviews | Links | Contact Us | Subscribe | Search | Top of page